Conclusion of Part III

Making the arbitrations explicit: robustness is measured, not proclaimed

Mind map of chapter 29: Part III made the arbitrations explicit — criteria, scores, weightings, scenarios. Dominance is rare, incomparability is normal: it signals real trade-offs. Context and uncertainty can reverse a conclusion, and robustness is measured. The four re-readings of the same material differ by what they receive: the table alone yields axes or groups, the table plus a partition yields a separating axis, the axioms yield degrees. In a model backed by an axiomatics, not everything is contested in the same place. A shared observatory is legitimate only if it presents its results as conditional.